Thymus Messages Interferon Donations Contact Us Complete Alternative Medicine Solution Pharmacy Hepatitis C PharmacyLloyd's HCV Book Chapters

On The Radio


Book Reviews

Order Book

Herb Schedule

Order Form

Read About:
NatCell Thymus
NatCell Liver
NatCell TLM
NatCell Mesenchyme
Aloe Vera
Milk Thistle
Vitamin C
Lipoic Acid
Licorice Root
Cats Claw
Dandelion Root
Olive Leaf


Shop Now


FDA Warns Milk Producers
October 5, 2003

FDA News

September 12, 2003
Media Inquiries: 301-436-2335
Consumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA

FDA Warns Milk Producers to Remove "Hormone Free" Claims
From the Labeling Of Dairy Products

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today issued Warning Letters to four manufacturers of whole milk, reduced fat milk and ice cream, informing them that their products are misbranded because the labels contain the false statements, "No Hormones" or "Hormone Free."

"FDA is committed to assuring that consumers are provided with truthful information on product labels," said FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan, MD., Ph.D.. "FDA will continue to take strong action to protect American consumers from products with labeling that is false or misleading."

During recent inspections, FDA investigators collected labels of dairy products, including various milk and ice cream products. FDA reviewed the labels and determined that the statements "No Hormones" and "Hormone Free" are false claims, and therefore, the products are misbranded under section 403(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). Under section 403(a) of the Act, a product is misbranded if any information presented on the label or labeling is false or misleading.

The Warning Letters explain that "No Hormones" and "Hormone Free" are false claims because all milk contains naturally occurring hormones, and milk can not be processed in a manner that renders it free of hormones.

FDA also cautioned the firms that the agency could pursue further action such as seizure and/or injunction, if they fail to take prompt action to correct their labels.

FDA has stated that food manufacturers who do not use milk from cows treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) may voluntarily inform consumers of this fact on their product labels or labeling, provided that the statements are truthful and not misleading.

Before the 1993 approval of rbST, FDA determined that the recombinant, or genetically engineered form of bST is virtually identical to a cow's natural somatotropin, a hormone produced in the pituitary gland that stimulates the production of milk. During that rbST approval process, FDA concluded that there is no significant difference between milk from treated and untreated cows. For that reason, FDA also concluded it does not have the authority to require special labeling for milk and dairy products from rbST-treated cows, and that producers have no basis for claiming that milk from cows not treated with rbST is safer than milk from rbST-treated cows.

Note from Lloyd

I think that the FDA should withdraw from this arrogant attitude that there is no difference from milk treated with rbST.

I do not want to drink any. Just because they are to damn stupid or money driven to say that there is no difference is not good enough for me!!!



Hep C Pharmacy | Cancer Pharmacy | Order Book | Awards | Thymus | Search This Site

  These statements are not intended to promote, sell, advertise
or otherwise induce anyone to purchase any product on this web site.

These statements have NOT been evaluated by the FDA
and are for informational purposes only.


All ©2001 Lloyd Wright
site maintained by FluxRostrum