by Consumer Advocate Tim
Bolen (c) 2003
The most-attacked health advocate on the face of the earth
in the last ten years, is a five foot four inch, 76 year old
woman with a twinkle in her eye that indicates a giant intelligence
- Dr. Hulda Clark under attack - AGAIN!
Big pharma is in trouble in America. They're losing the battle
between health and medicine. They're fighting a desperate,
and evil, battle. But, despite the fortune they're spending,
they're not going to win. The North American Health Freedom
Movement is too much for them.
Big pharma, through their "quackbuster" operation
run out of a New York advertising agency, has designed, and
executed, a program to "do in" those that cut into
their obscene profits. The whole supplement industry, as well
as oxygen therapies, colloidal silver, electro-medicine, etc.,
for instance, is targeted. Laboratories and testing devices
are under attack. Even activists are under attack. Big pharma
writes a lot of checks.
Interestingly, we, as health freedom advocates, sometimes
don't realize the "big picture" big pharma is trying
to fight. They need to discredit the WHOLE IDEA OF "HEALTH."
They need to protect the status quo of drug "treatment."
They cannot let the idea of "prevention" or "cure"
take hold. And, they absolutely cannot allow the idea of "self-health,"
the idea that we the people should be responsible for our
own health, to grow in the minds of Planet Earth's population.
To accomplish their goals, big pharma needs to attack the
health EDUCATORS - and discredit them any way they can. That's
what this article is about.
Almost every health educator on Planet Earth has been attacked
at one time or another. Book authors in the venue are used
to it. Big pharma has its minions in place. If nothing else,
an article will appear on that failed MD Stephen Barrett's
propaganda website quackwatch.com.
The most-attacked health advocate on the face of the earth
in the last ten years, is a five foot four inch, 76 year old
woman with a twinkle in her eye that indicates a giant intelligence.
Raised in a Mennonite environment of "self-help"
this woman generates spittle in the boardrooms of big pharma.
She sends pharma CEOs into near seizure, for she, in her books,
gives the people of Planet Earth sometimes simple, and sometimes
difficult, procedures and programs to rid their bodies of
life-threatening, and life-limiting issues, and no drugs are
involved.
Her name is Hulda Regehr Clark, and she's an author, research
scientist and health humanitarian. She's one of the finest
humans on the face of the earth. She ONLY looks outward -
towards solving humanity's health issues. I've known her,
personally, since September of 1999.
What makes her so dangerous?
Hulda Regehr Clark PhD, Naturopath's "The Cure For All
Diseases" book sells in the top one tenth of one percent
of all books on amazon.com. Her other three major books, "The
Cure for All Cancers, The Cure For All Advanced Cancers, and
the Cure For HIV/AIDS" aren't far behind. This fact alone
puts "the quackbusters," the real ones, those operating
out of that New York ad agency, into a rage. She scares big
pharma to death, with good reason. She has millions of supporters;
lay people, health professionals, health advocates, legislators...
I put together a whole website www.savedrclark.net a few
years ago about this issue - and I wasn't telling even half
of the problem. The attack on Clark should be studied by every
health advocate on the planet, for it outlines, in detail,
the modus operandi designed and used by that New York ad agency
to attack "health" advocates world-wide. Against
Clark, they've pulled almost every trick - and although they
tire her, the adversity just makes her work harder, and accomplish
more. Since Clark cares little about money and the trappings
of success, big pharma's not hurting her by forcing her to
defend against an onslaught of frivolous lawsuits perpetrated
by quackbuster minions. And, her supporters come to her aid.
What Makes Clark So Dangerous? It's Simple...
Clark has simple, common sense solutions to health problems.
For instance, her whole "CURE" idea.
Clark says in her cancer book: "The word cure in the
title was chosen, rather than treatment, because it is scientifically
accurate. When the true cause of an illness has been found
and, by removing it, the illness can be stopped or prevented,
a true cure has also been found. When the cause is not found
but the symptoms have been removed, helpful as this is, you
have only found a treatment. My research was a search for
the causes of cancer, how they might be removed, and whether
their removal would lead to the relief from the disease. I
did not merely search for relief from the disease as most
regular cancer research does. Even research into gene-replacement
does not address the cause of numerous mutations in cancer.
Nor does finding better ways to kill tumor cells. They are
treatments."
Then she goes on to say "Syncrometer testing technology
described in this book makes searching for causes and cures
possible. Hopefully, there will be a return to a search for
the cure for diseases like diabetes, heart disease, multiple
sclerosis, Parkinson's, and a lot of others that are now simply
being treated."
What makes Hulda Clark so dangerous? That's an easy answer
- she's RIGHT in what she says. We all know it. People do
what she says. Millions of people. Other health practitioners
have reached the same conclusions Clark has. So have Universities,
and other scientists. But Clark's books are everywhere. That's
the difference. She's found out how to reach the people.
So, What's Clark's Basic Idea?
Easy. She says that to prevent or cure a disease you only
have to normalize the body. Normal bodies successfully deal
with issues every day, 24 hours a day. It is the abnormalities
that cause problems. These abnormalities, by themselves sometimes,
or in combinations, are the causes of all the diseases she's
looked at in her research. To correct the situation by normalizing
the body, she says: (1) remove all toxins, but especially
five specific toxins, (2) get rid of certain parasites, (3)
kill off certain oncoviruses and their hosts, and (4) get
rid of certain bacterias and yeasts. (5) and, normalize the
body's oxidation.
It is this procedure, this program, this recommendation,
that has caused her to be the "The Most-Attacked Health
Advocate On the Face of The Earth..." This, and three
other things - her (a ) "Syncrometer" and (b) her
"Zapper," and (c) the fact that her books are read
all over the world - printed in 20 major languages.
Clark - Explained...
Clark is easy to understand if you start at the beginning,
and grasp her programs as a whole. Her 21 day cancer program,
for instance, is designed to accomplish all five of her "normalizing"
functions at once, over a 21 day period - toxin removal, parasite
removal, killing oncoviruses and their hosts, getting rid
of certain bacterias and yeast, and normalizing the body's
oxidation. 21 days to remove the cause, and let the body heal.
Simple.
What gets complicated is "how" you can tell which
toxins, etc., are present, and "how" Clark wants
you to remove those causes. For the first, Clark teaches you
how to use the Syncrometer. For the second, I'll let you read
the book for that.
Clark is Under Assault Again...
You'd think, after nine or ten defeats, the quackbusters
would just crawl back in the sewer and lick their wounds,
but they won't. There is too much at stake. Clark is too big
a threat to big pharma. More, and more people read her books.
More, and more practitioners emulate her ideas. More and more
people understand the difference between a treatment and a
cure. It isn't a matter of WANTING to try to stop Clark, big
pharma HAS TO stop Clark. Their very big-buck existence is
at stake. "Big pharma" would become "little
pharma" if everyone realized the difference between treatment
and cure.
I went to a meeting last Wednesday, with a group of attorneys
gearing up to defend against the latest onslaught. There,
I read the statements of the latest "testifying whores"
that the New York advertising agency was able to dig up out
of the cabbage patch. I had to laugh at the opposition's presentation.
Some people, especially those who didn't sparkle that well
in their own careers, will say anything for money.
What's different about the current assault is that the usual
"quackbusters" like Stephen Barrett, Bobbie Baratz.
etc., aren't openly involved. The New York ad agency has moved
them to a secondary role, I think. The whole thing is being
handled by what I have reason to believe are the "quackbusters"
that are employees of one of our government agencies.
The new assault against Clark is an "Operation Cure-All"
assault, and we already know that we're dealing here, with
an agency that doesn't seem to exist. It, apparently has no
director, no funding, no offices, no employees, and no one
supervising its activities.
But, we'll get to the bottom of it, now won't we?
|