What is wrong with the current medical/legal/government/law
enforcement syndicates as they related to medical injury
victims
"My Five Minutes"
I have been invited to give my "five-minute-opinion"
about what is wrong with the current medical/legal/government/law
enforcement syndicates as they related to medical injury
victims so, here it is:
It comes down to something my grandfather James told
me when I was about three: we were out walking and I saw
a discarded toy on the sidewalk and stooped to pick it
up. My grandfather told me not to touch it, that it belonged
to someone else who had been playing with it there and
would certainly come back for it later. I didn't
see another child anywhere and couldn't envision the concept
of ownership at that age and started to argue: "why
did they leave it? where did they go? when
will they come back? what is their name? why
can't I play with it until they come back for it?"
Grandpa said something that stuck in my head forever:
"All you need to know is that this toy doesn't belong
to you. You don't need to know anything else, don't
need to know who it belongs to, why they left it here,
when they will come back and get it. All you need
to know is that it is not yours and walk away unless you
have permission of the rightful owner to use it."
My message today is one I learned easily at age three
from my grandfather: "doctors, if it isn't yours,
leave it alone unless you have permission from the rightful
owner to use it. All you need to know is that it
is not yours..."
Since I have five minutes, I will devote the rest of
this message to everyone else and make you a list of the
truths I came to know the hardest way possible.
If I had known back in 1991 what I know today, known even
one of these things, my personal tragedy might have been
averted:
*When you are admitted to a hospital you are asked to
sign a standard "hospital admission form" and
are told something to the effect of "you need to
sign this so that we can treat you". But do
you understand what you have just signed?
Probably not. Few laypeople have the experience
necessary to accurately determine that they have just
signed a legal document with the language of a "power
of attorney" and have unwittingly signed their bodies
over to the hospital to do with as the hospital staff
deems fit. Whatever the hospital staff deems fit,
whether it will benefit them personally or not.
What if, on that day, you have signed yourself into
a teaching hospital and what they "deem fit"
is meeting the credentialing quotas of the residents they
are getting paid by the government to train? What
if that particular hospital's first interest is meeting
their contractual obligations to the government to procure
"teaching material" for the operating room so
each resident they have agreed to train can be provided
with the correct number of surgery experiences required
to get certified?
All teaching hospitals are not clearly labeled as such
so it is not always easy to determine exactly what KIND
of institution we have come to for our medical care needs.
This hospital admission form is the document that the
patient has to be mindful of, more so than the "surgery
consent form" or the "procedure consent form"
we are brought to sign after admission. The admission
form was signed first and everything signed after, while
you are still under their roof, is secondary to it.
If you do not listen to anything else I have to say
except this one thing, know that it is this one thing
that causes the most trouble when we are injured and seeking
justice later. This document is the foundation upon
which the case is built against us in Court: "well,
you signed that admission form, didn't you?"
Facts are, if a person signing a contract was not made
aware of ALL the terms of that contract before signing
the contract it automatically becomes null and void.
Were you told clearly that your surgery was actually
going to be performed by a resident trainee instead of
the already-trained, experienced surgeon you'd consulted?
Or that once anesthetized groups of medical students
were going to be invited into the operating room to line
up and practice pelvic and rectal exams on you without
your prior knowledge or consent, one after the other?
No? Then you were not made aware of ALL the
terms of the contract you'd just signed and it is rendered
null and void.
*Whether we are aware of it or not, we have ALL been
secretly divided into one of two stratifications: "high
priority" and "low priority". We
all have a label attached to us, regarding our stratification
assignment, on our computer file in a centralized computer
database. This database is accessible to authorized
personnel only--- all over the world. The operator
uses our NAME, BIRTHDATE, and SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER to
call up our file. (please note that the Social Security
number is not to be used by any other entity but the Social
Security Administration for identification purposes; that
the medical syndicate has been allowed to get away with
this is very interesting)
Each stratification has its own set of protocols attached
to it regarding what will be offered in medical care and
what will not---wherever we go.
The "high priority" stratification gets the
best care available: the most effective prescriptions
regardless of cost, effective pain control, organ transplants,
and so on. They do not have the burden of being
used for resident surgery training, device testing, or
any of the other violations reserved exclusively for those
who carry the "low priority" tag.
New surgical procedures, drugs, devices, implants and
so on are tested on the "low priority" stratification
and if these new things prove useful and worthwhile, they
are offered to those on the "high priority"
list---after all the "bugs" have been worked
out on the "low priority" people.
"Low priority" people are organ donors, never
recipients---unless there is an experiment going on and
human guinea pigs are needed. They are used for student
surgery training, drug and device testing, medical student's
"pelvic exam practice" without informed consent
when laid out on the operating room table anesthetized
for surgery, and any other risky or painful thing the
medical syndicate requires for its own purposes. When
the teaching hospitals have surgery resident's training/credentialing
quotas to meet a call goes out to family practitioners
offices and the Emergency Room doctors to send in referrals---from
the "low priority" stratification, always.
Who are labeled "low priority"? The
elderly retired. Housewives. Single over the age
of twenty-five. People with no dependents. Terminal
with other disease. In short, anyone who has a relatively
small monetary value on the scale medical malpractice
attorneys use to calculate monetary losses and "damages".
Attorneys will only accept medical malpractice cases
where they are assured of getting a great big financial
return for themselves (not for you; they have no interest
in you)---a return that is based on monetary losses
to the victim: "What are the damages?"
"Damages" calculated for the groups mentioned
are so low attorneys will not accept medical malpractice
cases brought in by these particular people no matter
how meritorious the claim itself might be. This
selection process has nothing to do with truth, merit
or justice---the attorneys are interested only in monetary
returns to themselves.
In a civil court, only monetary returns are offered;
medical malpractice cases are traditionally filed in civil
courts.
What you and I are not supposed to know, but the medical
syndicate knows well, is that the elderly retired, housewives,
single over the age of twenty-five, people with no dependents,
terminal with other disease groups are essentially "free
kills". Anything at all can be done, and IS
done, to these people in these particular groups with
no accountability whatsoever.
If you fit one or more of these categories you'd better
"watch your backs" whenever you have an encounter
of any sort with the medical syndicate; there is nobody
policing that system and if you don't look out for yourself
and take preventative action nobody else will, before
or after injury occurs, then it is too late.
*Attorneys
are "Officers of the Court", take a loyalty
oath to that effect. You will be paying their fees but
they will NEVER be working for YOU; their first loyalty
is to the Judicial branch of the government. And government
is not going to go after government, has secret "sovereign
immunity" protocols in place to protect the government-funded
residents and the hospital teaching programs from consequences
and rightful prosecution of medical injury victim's valid
claims.
*One
of the tools used to oppress and discourage medical malpractice
victims from seeking and getting relief through the Courts
is something called a "Certificate of Merit"
law, which is being challenged in some states as unConstitutional
in that it allows the perpetrators themselves the exclusive
right to decide which cases are going to be allowed into
the Court system, and which are not---even before the
cases are filed! If the medical syndicate doesn't
want certain kinds of cases recorded "on the books"
and resolved in the Courts all they have to do is filter
the most embarrassing or most criminal ones out of the
system entirely before they can be filed at all!
The "merit" of all cases with a monetary value
of over $25. are for JURIES to decide in a Courtroom.
That is what our Constitution says.
*Another
oppression used to discourage and control medical malpractice
victims are "Statute of Repose" laws that say
after a set period of time passes no case can be filed.
The law incentives this widespread, criminal action by
the medical syndicate: when an iatrogenic injury occurs
the medical community "sees nothing" for the
whole time the state's Statute of Repose is in effect,
which in many states is seven years.
The injury will be deliberately left untreated for seven
whole years, will get no active response and will remain
unrecorded no matter what manifests. Nothing will be done
to halt progression of the injury. Care is limited
to a sociopathically inhumane "symptomatic relief
only/noactive intervention" protocol and the doctors
will not be moved from this rule no matter what you say
or do.
The victim will be hung in limbo until the very day
that Statute of Repose expires. Whatever is left
standing on that day gets immediate action: the doctors
who "saw nothing" for seven long and painful
years "spring to life" suddenly, the "selective
blindness" lifts, and the truth is told. Whatever
care can be offered is offered---if the victim is still
alive. Staying alive untreated is the trick, especially
if you are not told what your injury is early in their
"game" so that you can take proper action in
your own behalf through alternative medicine while you
"wait" for your Statute of Repose to expire.
People are being deliberately "waited to death"
every day, all over this country.
If, when the Statute of Repose expires and you have
been allowed to deteriorate untreated to the point of
no return, and nothing can be done to reverse the damage
the doctor-caused injury has created, you will be given
a fake "cancer" diagnosis, allowed palliative
care, and fast-tracked to your grave.
*If
you are tagged "low priority" and come down
with an expensive, prolonged illness which makes you a
financial liability to your health insurer you will be
fast-tracked to the grave to save money. Remember
all those odd stories that have come out in the news regularly
where some doctor, respiratory therapist, or nurse was
accused or caught in the act of killing patients in hospitals,
nursing homes, or veteran's hospitals? Well, it
is just plain cheaper for the health insurers to place
and pay these killers to get rid of the policyholders
who turn into financial liabilities than to allow the
expensive, prolonged illness cases to continue after a
diagnosis is made and they are locked in to providing
proper care forever. For all these stories that
made it into the news at all there are thousands that
didn't. This goes on every day all over this country,
right underneath all our noses but we don't understand
what we are actually witnessing.
*Referring
doctors who send their patients to the teaching hospital's
training program to be used by their government-funded
students to practice on gets paid a "finder's fee".
Call it a kick-back, bonus, graft,
whatever-you-will--- "low priority" lives are
being bought and sold every day.
Patients are being lied to and scammed into undergoing
surgeries they do not really need in order to meet the
needs of the teaching hospital's resident training programs.
Some hospitals are so aggressive in snaring "training
material" that their ER doctors are admitting people
directly from the ER "for observation" then
offering surgery after admission; if the target refuses
surgery they are lied to and told if they don't go through
with what has been recommended the doctors will not sign
them out of the hospital---and if they leave without being
formally released their insurers will not pay the bill.
Parents of minor children are being falsely accused
of "child abuse" or "Munchausen-Syndrome-By-
Proxy" and their parental rights terminated, when
malpractice happens to their child, or when medical experiments
requiring children are being performed. Parents
are denied access to the child so that the parents cannot
witness what is actually going on, being done to that
child.
*There
is a centralized computer database where all of our clean,
unaltered medical records are kept that is accessible
only by people who have terminals and know the proper
passwords for each level of access. If you ask for
copies of your medical records you will never be allowed
to have what is kept in this computer database, you will
be given a copy of the sanitized paper file kept in the
fileroom. Hospital x-ray filerooms keep two envelopes
of your x-rays: a sanitized one and a "clean"
one labeled "for doctors only" and tagged with
a call-number---no name. You will be allowed access
only to the sanitized x-ray file.
*The
medical profession is not what you have been led to believe
it is. (neither is the legal profession and government
entities for that matter, but that is another story...)
There have been vast changes in the character and quality
of the medical system due to the introduction and spread
of "managed care". The insurance companies
have taken over and now control doctors through income,
sit directly in the middle of the doctor-patient relationship
and decides who gets what based on cost.
They've bought up the hospitals, made their plan doctors
stockholders and invented other "incentives and rewards"
to justify what amounts to murder of their policyholders
to boost profits. They also decide who gets what
based on profit too. One of the ways the insurers
and their stockholders can make money off their policyholders
is to use them for training surgery and allowing experimentation
in the teaching hospitals they have bought up. Private
companies pay good money to test medical devices, drugs,
equipment and so on. But the government pays out
about seven billion dollars a year in Medicare funds to
teaching hospitals to train residents. The teaching hospitals
have so many student slots to fill and and training students
is so lucrative an enterprise that if enough American
medical students cannot be recruited these slots will
be filled with foreign students; Medicare pays for that
too.
Training students brings money into the company; paying
for proper medical care for policyholders takes money
out of the company. It doesn't take a rocket scientist
to figure out who is going to end up on the short end
of things when money is the motivator.
Medical CRIME is rampant in this country. It is
rampant because the protection laws on the books are only
as good as the ones enforcing them---and there is no real
law enforcement. Justice (just-US) is reserved
exclusively for those who can afford to BUY it.
There is nobody standing up to make sure these kinds
of human-rights abuses are not allowed to occur in the
first place. And no place to take a violation for
proper resolution after-the-fact.
What we have now is a medical syndicate who knows it
can do absolutely
anything to anyone and get away with it. Even murder,
torture, and rob.
That is where we are at today.
Elizabeth Eugenia
LaBozetta Central Ohio Patient's-rights Service Citizen's
Organization for Patient Safety
* No Copyright;
reprint and distribute freely in its full and unaltered
form exactly as written above.